Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Which is Better?
Oct 2024 Arrow Lake vs Nov 2020 Ryzen 5000
The verdict
Core Ultra 9 285K winsCore Ultra 9 285K comes out ahead of Ryzen 9 5900X on productivity, while the rest of the picture is more nuanced. Core Ultra 9 285K is 41.1% faster than Ryzen 9 5900X in multi-core productivity workloads. Performance-per-dollar is comparable. For most builders, Core Ultra 9 285K is the more compelling pick across both gaming and productivity workloads.
Dimension-by-dimension
- Gaming285K +30.9%
Core Ultra 9 285K leads in gaming workloads by 30.9% over Ryzen 9 5900X.
- Productivity285K +41.1%
Core Ultra 9 285K is 41.1% faster than Ryzen 9 5900X in multi-core productivity workloads.
- ValueTie
Performance-per-dollar is comparable.
- Efficiency285K +38.0%
Core Ultra 9 285K runs 38.0% more efficient under the same productivity load than Ryzen 9 5900X.
Tune this comparison to your own priorities
Adjust gaming, productivity, value, and efficiency weights and watch the verdict recompute live.
Specifications
| Spec | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 12 |
| Threads | 24 | 24 |
| Boost clock | 5.7 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Base clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| TDP | 125 W | 105 W |
| L2 cache | 40 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 36 MB | 64 MB |
| MSRP | $589 | $549 |
| Process node | TSMC N3B | TSMC N7 |
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| Memory | DDR5-6400 | DDR4-3200 |
| Launched | Oct 2024 | Nov 2020 |
Benchmarks
- Multi-coreCinebench 2024· Cinebench 2024 nT+118.9%Core Ultra 9 285K2,425Ryzen 9 5900X1,108
- Single-coreCinebench 2024· Cinebench 2024 1T+38.1%Core Ultra 9 285K145Ryzen 9 5900X105
- Multi-coreGeekbench 6+49.5%Core Ultra 9 285K21,783Ryzen 9 5900X14,572
- Single-coreGeekbench 6+52.0%Core Ultra 9 285K3,419Ryzen 9 5900X2,249
Bars are normalized to the highest score in our catalog for each metric. Hover any row for the source attribution.
Price analysis
Core Ultra 9 285K costs more.